当前位置: X-MOL 学术Brain Behav. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Interactions between methodological and interindividual variability: How Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task contrast maps vary and impact associations with behavior
Brain and Behavior ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-22 , DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2093
Michael I Demidenko 1 , Alexander S Weigard 1, 2 , Karthikeyan Ganesan 1 , Hyesue Jang 1 , Andrew Jahn 3 , Edward D Huntley 4 , Daniel P Keating 1, 4
Affiliation  

Phenomena related to reward responsiveness have been extensively studied in their associations with substance use and socioemotional functioning. One important task in this literature is the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task. By cueing and delivering performance‐contingent reward, the MID task has been demonstrated to elicit robust activation of neural circuits involved in different phases of reward responsiveness. However, systematic evaluations of common MID task contrasts have been limited to between‐study comparisons of group‐level activation maps, limiting their ability to directly evaluate how researchers’ choice of contrasts impacts conclusions about individual differences in reward responsiveness or brain‐behavior associations.

中文翻译:

方法论变异和个体差异之间的相互作用:货币激励延迟(MID)任务对比图如何变化并影响与行为的关联

与奖赏反应性有关的现象已经在与物质使用和社会情感功能的关联中得到了广泛的研究。该文献中的一项重要任务是货币激励延迟(MID)任务。通过提示和提供基于绩效的奖励,MID任务已被证明可以激发涉及奖励响应不同阶段的神经回路的鲁棒激活。但是,对常见的MID任务对比的系统评估仅限于小组级激活图的研究之间的比较,从而限制了他们直接评估研究人员的对比选择如何影响有关奖励反应性或脑行为关联方面个人差异的结论的能力。
更新日期:2021-05-14
down
wechat
bug