当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Criminal Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
To Withdraw or Not to Withdraw: A Structural Analysis of the Scope and Limits of Voluntary Withdrawal of Criminal Attempt in the Rome Statute
International Criminal Law Review Pub Date : 2020-11-27 , DOI: 10.1163/15718123-bja10030
Igor Vuletić 1
Affiliation  

Voluntary withdrawal of criminal attempt is one of the fundamental institutes of the general part of criminal law, originally codified in international criminal law in the Rome Statute. Since the Statute attributed significant legal effects to withdrawal, which excludes the liability for criminal attempt, it is important to establish a clear understanding on its scope and limitations. This article analyses controversial issues related to the legal nature of withdrawal as grounds for exclusion of criminal liability, withdrawal of individual offenders and accomplices, and provides interpretations on potential solutions for these issues. The analysis is based on the subjective conception of withdrawal, under which its essence lays in the rejection of the initial criminal intent, while taking into consideration withdrawal in the context of international crime. Based on the analysis, an original three-level test for the determination of withdrawal in the future practice of the International Criminal Court, (icc) is proposed.



中文翻译:

撤回或不撤回:《罗马规约》自愿撤回犯罪未遂的范围和限制的结构分析

自愿撤回犯罪未遂是刑法总则的基本基础之一,最初是在《罗马规约》中编入国际刑法的。由于《规约》将撤回归因于重大的法律效力,这排除了犯罪未遂的责任,因此,重要的是要对撤回的范围和局限性有一个明确的了解。本文分析了与作为撤回刑事责任,撤回个人罪犯和同谋的理由的撤回法律性质有关的有争议的问题,并对这些问题的潜在解决方案提供了解释。该分析基于撤回的主观概念,其实质在于拒绝最初的犯罪意图,同时考虑到国际犯罪背景下的撤军。根据分析,确定国际刑事法院未来实践中撤回决定的原始三级测试,(icc)。

更新日期:2020-11-27
down
wechat
bug