A few final documents adopted by the Review Conferences of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (‘NPT’) include important references to nuclear disarmament and to Article VI of the NPT. It is frequently assumed or claimed that these references amount to subsequent agreements as to the interpretation of Article VI. However, such a view is difficult to maintain. With the help of the 2018 Draft Conclusions on subsequent agreements and practice, this article seeks to establish two conditions that such final documents ought to satisfy if they are to be treated as subsequent agreements under Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (‘VCLT’). The analysis suggests that the final documents in question do not satisfy such conditions. Based on this evaluation, the article also explores other theoretical frameworks both within and without treaty interpretation rules, that can adequately take into account the final documents of the NPT Review Conferences in discussing nuclear disarmament in international law.

在核不扩散条约（“的审查会议上通过的一些最后文件NPT ”），包括对核裁军和条重要参考VI的的条约。这是经常假设或声称这些引用达后续协定条的解释VI。但是，这种观点难以维持。在关于后续协议和惯例的2018年结论草案的帮助下，本条旨在确定两个条件，如果根据《维也纳条约法公约》第31条将这些最终文件视为后续协议，则应满足这些条件（ “维也纳条约法公约'）。分析表明，最终文件不满足这些条件。在此评估的基础上，本文还探讨了在条约解释规则之内和之外的其他理论框架，这些框架可以在讨论国际法中的核裁军时充分考虑到《不扩散核武器条约》审议大会的最后文件。