Judicial dialogue in the field of the protection of human rights has its own history and faces new challenges. In this article the author firstly explains the mechanism as such, and then tries to find some constructive conclusions concerning the real impact of this kind of judicial activity. All the considerations are focused mainly on the experiences of the European Court of Human Rights and its influence on the other “partners” involved in the effective protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals. Some impressive examples of the practice in this regard are exposed. Nonetheless, in the author’s opinion the visible changes of contemporary sociological conditions, mainly in Europe, have their consequences in the approach of the European courts. Being the main “creators” of human rights standards, they can influence in a tangible way the position of domestic judicial organs. In such a situation an active judicial dialogue (both in its horizontal and vertical dimensions) seems to be even more necessary.

保护人权领域的司法对话有着自己的历史，面临着新的挑战。在本文中，作者首先解释了这种机制，然后试图找到关于这种司法活动的实际影响的一些建设性结论。所有考虑都主要集中在欧洲人权法院的经验及其对有效保护个人权利和自由所涉及的其他“伙伴”的影响上。揭露了这方面的一些令人印象深刻的例子。尽管如此，作者认为，当代社会学状况的明显变化，主要是在欧洲，对欧洲法院的做法产生了影响。作为人权标准的主要“创造者”，它们可以切实影响国内司法机关的地位。在这种情况下，似乎更有必要进行积极的司法对话（无论是横向还是纵向）。