summary:

This article discusses a pair of textual variants, preserved by the scholia to the Odyssey and attributed to Zenodotus of Ephesus, that constitute the most significant pieces of evidence for the Cretan Odyssey theory. While the communis opinio holds that these variants cannot be explained as conjectures, and must therefore have been based on manuscript evidence, this article proposes a new interpretation of the evidence, and argues that Aristonicus’s long-discarded testimony (Σ HMa Od. 3.313a Ariston.) ought to be reconsidered, for it may reliably preserve the reason for these perplexing variants.

中文翻译：

---

重新评估克里特岛奥德赛理论的Scholiastic证据

概括：

本文讨论了一对文本变体，这些变体由奥德赛的霍乱保留，并归因于以弗所的Zenodotus，它们构成了克里特岛奥德赛理论的最重要证据。虽然群落opinio认为这些变体不能作为推测来解释，因此必须是基于对手稿的证据，本文提出的证据进行了新的诠释，并认为Aristonicus的长期废弃的证词（ΣHMA OD。3.313一个阿里斯顿。）应该重新考虑，因为它可以可靠地保留这些令人困惑的变体的原因。