Turkish Historical Review Pub Date : 2020-11-05 , DOI: 10.1163/18775462-bja10009 Aysel Yildiz 1
The Ottoman state authorities tried to prevent çiftlik formation in all parts of the empire. Yet, they also tried to keep this valuable and cash/kind-producing economic commodity under strict surveillance. The tax-farming and confiscation systems served as two important mechanisms of state control and ensured the state’s redistributive/reallocative role. Having the right to confiscate and redistribute estates, as well as being the ultimate decision maker in the tax-farming system, the Ottoman authorities acted as the chief regulator of the çiftlik market. Therefore, the central state was always a crucial party to be taken into consideration in the triangle of the çiftlik economy together with the peasantry and the çiftlik holders. This article provides a survey of four çiftliks in Larissa (Yenişehir-i Fener), namely Yeğenli, Göçeri, Köleler, and Zaim, in order to understand the redistributive and reallocative role of the Ottoman imperial center and its impact on the history of the region.
中文翻译:
政治,经济和宗教信仰:拉里萨(Laniissa)的四个宗教信仰的历史(Yenişehir-iFener)
奥斯曼帝国政府试图阻止帝国各个地区的文教运动的形成。然而,他们也试图严格控制这种有价值的,生产现金/实物的经济商品。税收耕种和没收制度是国家控制的两个重要机制,并确保了国家的再分配/再分配作用。奥斯曼当局拥有没收和重新分配遗产的权利,并且是税收耕种制度的最终决策者,是çiftlik市场的主要监管者。因此,中央政权始终是至关重要的政党,在夫斯基利克经济三角地区,连同农民和夫斯基利克持有人。本文提供了对拉里萨(Yenişehir- iFener)的四个ift的调查,即Yeğenli,Göçeri,Köleler和Zaim,以便了解奥斯曼帝国中心的再分配和再分配作用及其对奥斯曼帝国中心的影响。地区。