Over the years, many scholars have focused on the hierarchical and overpowering influence of Martin Heidegger upon Hannah Arendt’s thought. This view follows the stereotype concerning philosophical influence in which an all-knowing teacher affects the thought of the student, particularly if the student is a woman. In this paper, I argue that the story of philosophical influence is more complicated. In this case, the biographical archive establishes how Karl Jaspers, Martin Heidegger, and Hannah Arendt mutually influenced one another throughout their lives and careers. This evidence contests the typical view of philosophical influence which is hierarchical and often gendered and suggests a new model for understanding philosophical influences as dynamic and reciprocal.

多年来，许多学者一直关注马丁·海德格尔对汉娜·阿伦特思想的等级制和压倒性影响。这种观点遵循关于哲学影响的刻板印象，其中全知的老师会影响学生的思想，特别是如果学生是女人的话。在本文中，我认为哲学影响的故事更为复杂。在这种情况下，传记档案确定了卡尔·贾斯珀斯，马丁·海德格尔和汉娜·阿伦特如何在他们的一生和职业中相互影响。这一证据与哲学影响的典型观点相抗衡，这种观点具有等级性并且经常是性别化的，并提出了一种新的模型来理解哲学影响是动态的和互惠的。