Mnemosyne Pub Date : 2020-09-04 , DOI: 10.1163/1568525x-12342720 Stefan Alexandru 1
Some nineteenth-century scholars misleadingly thought that no Greek codex supports Galen’s legal affiliation to the gens Claudia. When the manuscript Thessalonicensis Vlatadon 14 was thrust into the limelight with regard to this issue in 2011, it was promptly imagined that the relevant information derived from Renaissance Italy, thanks to the voyages and studies of John Argyropoulos. Allegedly there also is a codex gemellus of the Vlatadon witness, the MS Athous Iviron Graecus 184, which does not transmit that gentilic name. The article shows that the latter codex cannot reasonably be regarded as a twin manuscript of the former. Moreover, it disproves the widespread scholarly claim that Galen is never named Claudius in documents that antedate the Age of Humanism, drawing attention to some insufficiently explored Byzantine sources, the oldest of which dates back to around 1200 AD.
中文翻译:
盖兰出身克劳迪娅氏族的讽刺评论
十九世纪的一些学者误导性地认为,希腊的法典不支持盖伦(Galen)与克劳迪亚(Claudia)世代的法律从属关系。当2011年有关该问题的手稿Thessalonicensis Vlatadon 14成为人们关注的焦点时,由于约翰·阿吉罗普洛斯(John Argyropoulos)的航行和研究,很快就想到了有关信息来自意大利文艺复兴时期。据说那里还有一个法典双子座Vlatadon证人的名字,MS Athous Iviron Graecus 184,它不传递那个普通名字。该文章表明,后一个抄本不能合理地视为前一个抄本的孪生手稿。此外,它反驳了广泛的学术主张,即在人文主义时代之前的文献中,盖伦从未被命名为克劳迪乌斯,引起人们对一些尚未充分探索的拜占庭渊源的关注,该渊源最早可追溯至公元1200年左右。