Middle East Law and Governance Pub Date : 2020-12-17 , DOI: 10.1163/18763375-12030006 Noah Salomon 1
Written in the context of Sudan and Lebanon’s 2018–19 revolutions, this article examines the discourse of two religious movements that are intricately entangled with the state as they negotiate popular demands to rethink that state, weighing competing claims to revolutionary salience along the way. It argues that revolution, even when it is working to reimagine states construed on confessional lines, has a particularly religious character. This is both because it demands that we rethink religion, given its unavoidable imbrication in the workings of the modern state, and because phenomenologically it too advocates ethical and ontological transformation that has the power to transcend and outlive political reform.
中文翻译:
革命时期的时刻
本文是在苏丹和黎巴嫩2018–19革命的背景下撰写的,研究了两个宗教运动的话语,这些运动在与国家谈判人民重新思考该国家的需求时错综复杂,并一路权衡对革命重要性的主张。它认为,即使革命正在努力重新构想以悔路线来解释的国家,它也具有特别的宗教性。这是因为它要求我们重新考虑宗教,因为宗教不可避免地融入了现代国家的运作之中,而且还因为从现象学上讲,它也倡导具有超越和超越政治改革能力的伦理和本体论转变。