The question examined in this article is whether, as it engages in its second century, the ilo remarkable resilience will lead it to face the challenge of its “regulatory” raison d’être in a context where the uneven social impact of globalisation seems to make it more relevant than ever. The first part of the article deals with the ilo constitutional capacity to effectively discharge this regulatory function. The answer hinges on the dialectical interplay between the specific legitimacy arising of the ilo tripartite structure; its capacity to do so through persuasive ‘state centric’ means; and finally the tripartite willingness to discharge it. The second part discusses the likelihood of two possible regulatory ‘atrophy’ or ‘revival’ scenarios. The first may develop as a result of divergent motivations and interests among ilo constituents, and the trend towards its further integration into the un through the 2030 sdg. The second may prevail as a result of the growing external pressure for a more equitable distribution of the benefits and constraints (including environmental) of global interdependence. This pressure needs to be met to spare disruptive consequences, and the ilo could help meet it—subject to a more imaginative and integrated use of its normative tools and of the ilc as a ‘real economy’ forum, to promote greater coherence in the pursuit of socio-economic-environmental commitments. It concludes by highlighting that the ilo offers a readily available regulatory potential which cannot be found elsewhere at the universal level; the centenary celebration could offers a unique opportunity to trigger the momentum necessary to optimise it—though it may not be the most likely outcome.

在这篇文章中研究的问题是，因为它在它的第二个世纪接合时，该劳工组织卓越的韧性会导致它要面对它的“监管”的挑战，存在的理由在全球化的不均衡的社会影响似乎使上下文它比以往任何时候都更相关。与文章的第一部分是国际劳工组织宪法能力，有效履行这一监管职能。答案取决于伊洛所产生的特定合法性之间的辩证相互作用三方结构；它有能力通过有说服力的“以国家为中心”的手段做到这一点；最后，三方愿意将其排出。第二部分讨论了两种可能的调节性“萎缩”或“复兴”情况的可能性。第一个可能是由于伊洛族三方成员的动机和利益不同，以及其在2030年可持续发展目标（SDG）中进一步融入联合国的趋势的结果。第二种可能是由于越来越大的外部压力要求更公平地分配全球相互依存的利益和制约因素（包括环境）而导致的。这种压力需要得到满足，以备破坏性的后果，以及国际劳工组织可以帮助实现这一目标，但需要更富想象力和综合性地使用其规范工具和ilc作为“实体经济”论坛，以促进在追求社会经济环境承诺方面的更大一致性。最后，我着重指出，国际劳工组织具有随时可用的监管潜力，这是普遍水平上其他地方所没有的；百年庆典可以提供一个独特的机会来触发优化它的动力，尽管这可能不是最可能的结果。