当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Jewish Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Did Pharaoh Repent? On the Development and Transformation of an Aggadic Motif
European Journal of Jewish Studies Pub Date : 2019-02-01 , DOI: 10.1163/1872471x-11311060
Arnon Atzmon

This article focuses on the shifts in the portrayal of Pharaoh in aggadic midrashic compositions, mostly those connected with Exodus 13:17. Tannaitic Midrashim from the Roman period create the motif of “Pharaoh’s repentance.” Aggadic Midrashim from the Byzantine period reject, in turn, this motif. At the end of the Byzantine period, perhaps influenced by the Islamic reading of the biblical Pharaoh, the motif of “Pharaoh’s repentance” returns to the fore and even enjoys some literary development. The dynamic changes that these interpretations underwent reflect shifts in the internal spiritual life of the sages and in their interchanges with the surrounding cultures.



中文翻译:

法老Re悔了吗?论蛇形母题的发展与转化

本文重点讨论法老王在敏捷的中鞭毛成分中的写照变化,这些变化大多与出埃及记13:17有关。罗马时期的塔尼提克·米拉达希姆(Tannaitic Midrashim)创造了“法老的re悔”主题。拜占庭时期的Aggadic Midrashim则拒绝了这一主题。在拜占庭时期末期,也许是受伊斯兰阅读圣经中《法老王》的影响,“法老王的悔改”的主题再次脱颖而出,甚至在文学上有所发展。这些解释所经历的动态变化反映了圣人内部精神生活的变化以及与周围文化的交流。

更新日期:2019-02-01
down
wechat
bug