In the course of the last eighteen years more than 75 new “Dead Sea Scrolls” fragments have surfaced on the antiquities market. These are commonly referred to as post-2002 Dead Sea Scrolls-like fragments. A growing number of scholars regard a substantial part of them as forgeries. In this article, we will discuss four more dubious fragments, but this time from the 20th Century—or at least from pre-2002. Two of the fragments have been known since the late nineties and are published in the DJD series. One was published in Revue de Qumran (2003), and one in Gleanings from the Caves (2016). All four are today accepted as part of the Dead Sea Scrolls dataset even though they are unprovenanced and have made-up—or at least very adaptable—lists of previous owners. In this article, we will critically review their provenance and discuss the lack of proper interest in provenance on the part of the collector who owns them and the scholars who published them.

在过去的18年中，古物市场上出现了75多个新的“死海古卷”碎片。这些通常称为2002年后的死海古卷状碎片。越来越多的学者认为其中很大一部分是伪造的。在本文中，我们将讨论另外四个可疑片段，但这一次是20世纪，或者至少是2002年前。自90年代后期以来，其中的两个片段便已为人所知，并在DJD系列中出版。一本发表在Revue de Qumran（2003年）上，一本发表在《来自洞穴的拾音》（2016）。今天，这四个人都被接受为“死海古卷”数据集的一部分，即使它们没有根据，并且已编造（或至少具有非常强的适应性）以前的所有者清单。在本文中，我们将批判性地审查它们的出处，并讨论拥有它们的收藏家和出版它们的学者对起源的缺乏适当的兴趣。