A pragmatist philosopher of history asks what practical difference it makes for this or that historical “fact” to be taken as “useful and meaningful,” and then consider that the principal motivation behind what is recorded, what continues to circulate, and to what extent, in the annals of historical texts. Part of the methodology of pragmatism is derived from history, since usefulness is attested over time. History and historiography are shaped, in part, by pragmatic interests. This discussion is indispensable for the era of digital humanities that is upon us, with all the new materials and interpretations that are to come as a result.

中文翻译：

---

实用主义的历史与实用主义的历史：数字人文学科必不可少的对话

实用主义者的历史哲学家问，对于这个或那个历史“事实”被认为是“有用和有意义的”有什么实际的区别，然后考虑了所记录的东西，继续传播的东西以及传播的程度的主要动机。 ，在历史文本的编年史中。实用主义方法论的一部分来自历史，因为随着时间的流逝，其实用性得到了证明。历史和史学部分地受到实用主义利益的影响。对于我们即将到来的数字人文时代，这种讨论是必不可少的，其结果是将出现所有新材料和新解释。