当前位置: X-MOL 学术Arab Law Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar v. United Arab Emirates): So Far, So Good?
Arab Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-09-24 , DOI: 10.1163/15730255-bja10053
Udoka Ndidiamaka Owie 1
Affiliation  

International law has a long history of dealing with racial discrimination, including its involvement in the perpetration of racial discrimination. However, in establishing a body of norms to tackle the problems of racial discrimination, several multilateral instruments have been adopted under the auspices of the United Nations addressing this malaise to various extents with the most extensive being the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) of 21 December 1965. While lauded for its singular and dedicated focus on racial discrimination, the Convention is challenged, at least interpretatively, as to the grounds for racial discrimination within its remit. Events occurring between Qatar and the United Arab Emirates on 5 June 2017 have afforded the International Court of Justice as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, an opportunity—the third since the coming into effect of the Convention—to interpret this landmark treaty.



中文翻译:

《消除一切形式种族歧视国际公约》的适用(卡塔尔诉阿拉伯联合酋长国):到目前为止,很好吗?

国际法在处理种族歧视方面有着悠久的历史,包括参与种族歧视的作法。但是,在建立一套解决种族歧视问题的规范时,在联合国主持下通过了几项多边文书,以不同程度解决了这一弊端,其中最广泛的是《消除一切形式种族歧视国际公约》。种族歧视(CERD)(1965年12月21日)。尽管因其对种族歧视的特殊关注而受到称赞,但至少在解释上,《公约》在其职权范围内对种族歧视的理由提出了质疑。卡塔尔与阿拉伯联合酋长国之间于2017年6月5日发生的事件使国际法院成为联合国的主要司法机关,这是解释该具有里程碑意义的条约的机会,这是《公约》生效以来的第三次机会。

更新日期:2020-09-24
down
wechat
bug