当前位置: X-MOL 学术ICES J. Mar. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Baranov's contributions to the Beverton–Holt model
ICES Journal of Marine Science ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-13 , DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsaa239
Trevor J Kenchington 1
Affiliation  

Abstract
The core of Beverton and Holt’s seminal work of the 1950s had been anticipated by Baranov 30 years earlier, but his contributions, published in Russian, remained poorly known to Anglophone scientists until after 1945. By that time, Russell and Graham had presented parallel ideas, though without Baranov’s mathematics. Limited subsequent acknowledgement of the Russian’s contributions has left an impression that each of his advances was achieved independently in England, hence that they contributed little to the Beverton–Holt model. I here construct a timeline of events linking and separating the Russian and English studies. From it, I argue that both Russell’s presentation of the underlying concepts and Graham’s decision to pursue a mathematical realization of his “Modern Theory” may have been influenced by translations of Baranov’s papers. Moreover, when Holt developed the “simple” Beverton–Holt model during 1946–1947, he certainly drew on Baranov’s exponential model of mortality, though perhaps only via Ricker.


中文翻译:

Baranov 对 Beverton-Holt 模型的贡献

摘要
贝弗顿和霍尔特 1950 年代开创性工作的核心在 30 年前就已被巴拉诺夫预料到,但他的贡献以俄语发表,直到 1945 年之后才为英语国家的科学家所知甚少。 那时,罗素和格雷厄姆提出了平行的想法,虽然没有巴拉诺夫的数学。随后对俄罗斯贡献的有限认可给人留下的印象是他的每一项进步都是在英国独立实现的,因此他们对贝弗顿-霍尔特模型的贡献很小。我在这里构建了一个连接和分离俄语和英语研究的事件时间表。据此,我认为罗素对基本概念的陈述和格雷厄姆追求他的“现代理论”的数学实现的决定都可能受到了巴拉诺夫论文翻译的影响。而且,
更新日期:2021-03-13
down
wechat
bug