当前位置: X-MOL 学术Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Concordance between the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and Clinical Assessment of Attention Deficit-Adult (CAT-A) over-reporting validity scales for detecting invalid ADHD symptom reporting
Applied Neuropsychology: Adult ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-14 , DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1894150
Sophie I Leib 1, 2 , Christine Schieszler-Ockrassa 1, 3 , Daniel J White 1, 3 , Virginia T Gallagher 1 , Dustin A Carter 1 , Karen S Basurto 1 , Gabriel P Ovsiew 1 , Zachary J Resch 1, 2 , Kyle J Jennette 1 , Jason R Soble 1, 4
Affiliation  

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between symptom validity scales on the Clinical Assessment of Attention Deficit-Adult (CAT-A) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in the context of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) evaluation. The sample comprised 140 consecutive patients referred for a neuropsychological evaluation of ADHD and were administered the CAT-A and the MMPI-2-RF and a battery of performance-based neurocognitive tests. Results indicated CAT-A/MMPI-2-RF symptom validity concordance of 51% between measures, with 38% concordant valid and 13% concordant invalid responses. Among those with discordance symptom validity results, rates of valid CAT-A/invalid MMPI-2-RF responding (41%) were more common than invalid CAT-A/valid MMPI-2-RF responding (8%). Results also indicated higher levels of ADHD symptoms among invalid responding within the CAT-A, whereas the MMPI-2-RF Cognitive Complaints scale did not differ by CAT-A validity status. Finally, symptom validity scales on both the CAT-A and MMPI-2-RF were largely discordant from neuropsychological test validity status per performance validity tests. Findings highlight the need for symptom validity testing when assessing ADHD and indicate that validity indices on broad personality assessments may assess different constructs than embedded validity indices in ADHD-specific measures.



中文翻译:

明尼苏达多相人格量表 2 重组表 (MMPI-2-RF) 与成人注意力缺陷临床评估 (CAT-A) 过度报告有效性量表检测无效 ADHD 症状报告的一致性

摘要

本研究调查了注意力缺陷成人临床评估 (CAT-A) 和明尼苏达州多相人格量表-2-重组表 (MMPI-2-RF) 在注意力缺陷/多动情况下的症状效度量表之间的关系障碍 (ADHD) 评估。该样本包括 140 名连续接受 ADHD 神经心理学评估的患者,并接受了 CAT-A 和 MMPI-2-RF 以及一系列基于性能的神经认知测试。结果表明,测量之间的 CAT-A/MMPI-2-RF 症状有效性一致性为 51%,38% 一致有效,13% 一致无效响应。在症状有效性结果不一致的人群中,有效 CAT-A/无效 MMPI-2-RF 响应率(41%)比无效 CAT-A/有效 MMPI-2-RF 响应率(8%)更常见。结果还表明,在 CAT-A 内无效响应中的 ADHD 症状水平较高,而 MMPI-2-RF 认知投诉量表没有因 CAT-A 有效性状态而异。最后,CAT-A 和 MMPI-2-RF 的症状效度量表在很大程度上与每个性能效度测试的神经心理学测试效度状态不一致。研究结果强调了在评估 ADHD 时进行症状有效性测试的必要性,并表明广泛人格评估的有效性指标可能评估与 ADHD 特定测量中嵌入有效性指标不同的结构。CAT-A 和 MMPI-2-RF 的症状效度量表在很大程度上与每个性能效度测试的神经心理学测试效度状态不一致。研究结果强调了在评估 ADHD 时进行症状有效性测试的必要性,并表明广泛人格评估的有效性指标可能评估与 ADHD 特定测量中嵌入有效性指标不同的结构。CAT-A 和 MMPI-2-RF 的症状效度量表在很大程度上与每个性能效度测试的神经心理学测试效度状态不一致。研究结果强调了在评估 ADHD 时进行症状有效性测试的必要性,并表明广泛人格评估的有效性指标可能评估与 ADHD 特定测量中嵌入有效性指标不同的结构。

更新日期:2021-03-14
down
wechat
bug