Abstract

This essay is composed of commentaries from four scholars critically evaluating Noordegraaf’s article ‘Protective or Connective Professionalism? How Connected Professionals Can (Still) Act as Autonomous and Authoritative Experts’. All four scholars, in different ways and from their different perspectives, question the dichotomy at the heart of Noordegraaf’s article, arguing that professionals have always been connective and connected, and moreover, that protective professionalism has not disappeared. They recommend more conceptual development to unpack the changing nature of connectivity and protectionism, as well as more attention to inequalities within and among professions, power, and professional agency.

中文翻译：

---

从保护性职业到连接性职业精神：Vadis专业排他性吗？

摘要

本文由来自四位学者的评论组成，这些评论家对Noordegraaf的文章“保护性还是连接性专业精神？互联专家如何（仍然）充当自治专家和权威专家。这四位学者以不同的方式和不同的角度质疑诺德格拉夫文章核心的二分法，认为专业人士一直是联系和联系的，而且保护性专业主义并没有消失。他们建议进行更多的概念性开发，以揭示连通性和保护主义不断变化的性质，并更多地关注职业，权力和专业代理机构内部和之间的不平等现象。