This article examines accounts of the moral basis of compensatory duties that explain such duties as the continuation, in some way, of the pre-wrong normative situation. I identify, contrast, and assess three versions of this view—duty continuity, right continuity, and reasons continuity. I argue that each version is defensible, once properly articulated. The article responds to a range of objections to these views that have not received much critical attention by their proponents.

中文翻译：

---

补偿和连续性

本文考察了补偿义务的道德基础的解释，这些义务以某种方式解释了错误之前的规范情况的延续。我识别、对比和评估这种观点的三个版本——责任连续性、权利连续性和理由连续性。我认为每个版本都是站得住脚的，只要表达得当。这篇文章回应了对这些观点的一系列反对意见，这些反对意见并未受到其支持者的太多批判性关注。