This essay explores the relation between worldly orientation and rational comprehension in Kant. Both require subjective grounds of differentiation that were eventually developed into a contextualizing principle for reflective judgement. This kind of judgement can proceed either inductively to find new universals or by analogy to symbolically link different objective spheres. I will argue that the basic orientational function of reflective judgement is to modally differentiate the formal horizonal contexts of field, territory, domain and habitat laid out in the Introduction to the Critique of the Power of Judgement. Assessing which context takes priority will be important in making aesthetic judgements and for applying practical reason to comprehend human affairs.

中文翻译：

---

康德与定向和语境思维的需要：将反思判断应用于美学和对人类生活的理解

本文探讨康德的世俗取向与理性理解之间的关系。两者都需要主观的区分基础，这些基础最终发展成为反思判断的情境化原则。这种判断既可以通过归纳方式寻找新的普遍性，也可以通过类比方式将不同的客观领域符号联系起来。我将论证反思判断的基本定位功能是模态区分领域、领地、领域和栖息地的正式水平背景对判断力的批判. 评估哪个语境优先对于做出审美判断和应用实际理性来理解人类事务非常重要。