当前位置: X-MOL 学术Kantian Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Dreams of a Spirit-Seer and Kant’s Critical Method: Comments on Stephen R. Palmquist’s Kant and Mysticism
Kantian Review Pub Date : 2020-12-17 , DOI: 10.1017/s1369415420000461
J. Colin McQuillan

In his new book, Kant and Mysticism, Stephen Palmquist argues that Kant had already formulated his critical method by the mid-1760s and that it emerged from his reflections on Swedenborg’s mystical visions. In order to evaluate these claims, I consider Kant’s correspondence with Charlotte von Knobloch and Moses Mendelssohn before and after the publication of Dreams of a Spirit-Seer; the context in which Kant published Dreams; and the method he employs when he discusses Swedenborg’s visions in that work. I conclude that Kant’s critical method was not well-formed during the 1760s and did not emerge from Kant’s reflections on Swedenborg.

中文翻译:

精神先知的梦想和康德的批判方法:斯蒂芬·R·帕姆奎斯特的康德和神秘主义评论

在他的新书中,康德和神秘主义,斯蒂芬·帕姆奎斯特认为,康德在 1760 年代中期已经制定了他的批判方法,并且它来自他对斯威登堡神秘愿景的反思。为了评估这些主张,我考虑了康德与夏洛特·冯·诺布洛赫和摩西·门德尔松的通信在发表之前和之后精神先知的梦想; 康德发表的语境; 以及他在讨论斯威登堡在那部作品中的愿景时所采用的方法。我的结论是,康德的批判方法在 1760 年代形成的并不完善,也不是从康德对斯威登堡的反思中出现的。
更新日期:2020-12-17
down
wechat
bug