This contribution offers a sympathetic historical and intercultural reflection on Stephen Palmquist’s work Kant and Mysticism. It examines (1) the appropriateness of this portrayal of Kant and mysticism in relation to its historical context (which encompasses figures such as Malebranche, Spinoza and Swedenborg), suggesting that Kant is committed to an account of rationality, ethical personhood and a ‘critical ethos’ in tension with mysticism; and (2) the inadequacy of Kant’s understanding of mysticism in the context of South and East Asian philosophical and religious discourses, indicating the need for an intercultural turn in the philosophy of religion.

中文翻译：

---

批判神秘主义还是批判精神？斯蒂芬·帕姆奎斯特的康德与神秘主义的跨文化反思

这一贡献对斯蒂芬·帕姆奎斯特的作品进行了富有同情心的历史和跨文化反思康德与神秘主义. 它检验了 (1) 这种对康德和神秘主义的描绘与其历史背景（包括马勒布朗什、斯宾诺莎和斯威登堡等人物）相关的适当性，表明康德致力于对理性、道德人格和“批判精神与神秘主义的紧张关系；(2)康德在南亚和东亚哲学和宗教话语背景下对神秘主义的理解不足，表明宗教哲学需要跨文化转向。