In protected areas, natural resources support the livelihood needs of local communities, but human activity affects wildlife survival and biodiversity conservation, and leads to serious human–animal conflict, such as crop raiding, livestock predation, and loss of human life. Therefore, the future of wildlife is always in conflict with the livelihood of communities. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 recognises the basic livelihood rights of forest dwellers, but its implementation is besieged with several problems at various institutional levels. With special reference to the implementation of the Forest Rights Act in protected areas of Odisha, this paper discusses the conflict between concepts of conservation and livelihood of people, and suggests some ways to strengthen livelihoods. : Forest, livelihoods, protected areas, rights, tribals : Q 23, Q 24, Q 28 Keywords

中文翻译：

---

印度奥里萨邦保护区的《 2006年森林权利法》：将保护与生计之间的冲突具体化

在保护区中，自然资源满足了当地社区的生计需求，但是人类活动影响了野生生物的生存和生物多样性的保护，并导致了严重的人畜冲突，例如农作物掠夺，牲畜捕食和生命损失。因此，野生生物的未来总是与社区的生计相冲突。2006年《森林权利法》承认森林居民的基本生计权，但其实施在各个机构层面都遇到了若干问题。本文特别参考《奥里萨邦保护区森林权利法》的执行情况，讨论保护和民生概念之间的冲突，并提出一些加强民生的方法。：森林，生计，保护区，权利，部落：问题23，问题24，