当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Soc. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Traditionalism and victim blaming
The Journal of Social Psychology ( IF 2.768 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-11 , DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1896466
Richard B Felson 1 , Christopher C Palmore 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

A common claim is that rape victims are blamed for the crime because they have violated gender roles. We tested this idea by examining whether the relationship between traditional attitudes about gender roles and victim blaming is observed when the victim’s gender role violation is not followed by rape. We also examined whether participants with traditional attitudes about casual sex were more likely to engage in victim blaming than their “liberal” counterparts. College students (Study 1: N = 348; Study 2: N = 239) were presented with vignettes that ended in either rape, robbery, assault, homicide, or accident, or had no outcome. Participants with traditional attitudes about gender roles did not assign more blame to victims than liberal participants unless the victim’s behavior was followed by rape. In contrast, participants with traditional attitudes about casual sex were more likely to blame victims regardless of the outcome. The pattern suggests that the relationship between traditional attitudes about gender roles and victim blaming is not be due to the victim’s violation of gender roles. In addition, victim blaming is due, in part, to the negative attitudes of some students to casual sex.



中文翻译:

传统主义和受害者指责

摘要

一个普遍的说法是强奸受害者被指责为犯罪,因为他们违反了性别角色。我们通过检查当受害者的性别角色侵犯之后没有发生强奸时是否观察到关于性别角色的传统态度与受害者责备之间的关系来测试这个想法。我们还研究了对随意性行为持传统态度的参与者是否比他们的“自由派”同行更容易指责受害者。大学生(研究 1:N = 348;研究 2:N= 239) 的小插曲以强奸、抢劫、袭击、凶杀或事故告终,或者没有结果。对性别角色持传统态度的参与者不会比自由派参与者更多地责怪受害者,除非受害者的行为随后发生了强奸。相比之下,无论结果如何,对随意性行为持传统态度的参与者更有可能责怪受害者。该模式表明,关于性别角色的传统态度与受害者责备之间的关系并不是由于受害者对性别角色的侵犯。此外,受害者指责部分是由于一些学生对随意性行为的消极态度。

更新日期:2021-03-11
down
wechat
bug