This paper focuses on the moral work of journalism as displayed and enacted in the reporting practices used in news coverage of scandalous talk by right-wing populist (RWP) politicians. Using a qualitative discourse-analytic approach, we analyze a set of cases of journalistic framing of RWP talk recently circulating in Sweden, Greece, France and the UK, and examine ways in which anti-democratic or racist talk is represented within print, online and broadcast news media. We show how the complex dynamics of different kinds of discursive framing of scandalous talk construct boundaries between right and wrong which contribute to processes of normalising populist discourses and agendas. Moreover, we call attention to the challenge that this poses for contemporary journalism both within public service and commercial networks, as reporting on right-wing populism involves a balancing act between disparate constraints and exigencies of journalism.

本文着重于右翼民粹主义（RWP）政治家对新闻报道的丑闻报道中所采用和报道的新闻实践中的新闻道德工作。我们使用定性的话语分析方法，分析了瑞典，希腊，法国和英国最近流传的RWP谈话的新闻报道框架案例，并研究了在印刷，在线和网络上如何代表反民主或种族主义谈话的方式。广播新闻媒体。我们展示了丑闻性谈话的各种不同话语框架的复杂动态如何在对与错之间建立边界，这些边界有助于规范民粹主义话语和议程的过程。此外，我们提请注意这对公共服务和商业网络中的当代新闻业构成的挑战，