当前位置: X-MOL 学术Foundations of Science › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Perspectives on Living and Thinking Vectors of the Anthropocene
Foundations of Science ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-12 , DOI: 10.1007/s10699-020-09770-1
Melentie Pandilovski

Helena De Preester’s “Subjectivity and Transcendental Illusions in the Anthropocene” aims to rethink fundamentally the human–technology relationship against the backdrop of the Anthropocene. Essentially, the essay is concerned with the current form of subjectivity that characterizes humankind in the Anthropocene, and analyzes how it embeds knowledge, desire and behavior. De Preester indeed succeeds in creating a potent and engaging reflection on the current form of human subjectivity characteristic for the age of the Anthropocene, by referring to Vilém Flusser’s apparatuses, McKenzie Wark’s vectoralist class, Stiegler’s savoir-vivre and object of addiction, Robert Pfaller’s notion of interpassivity; Williams’ attention economy, etc. However, De Preester throughout her essay, although discussing thoroughly the aforementioned ideas of subjectivity and transcendental illusions in the Anthropocene (as much as the essay format allows for this), falls short in her ambitious aspiration to rethink fundamentally the human–technology relationship against the backdrop of the Anthropocene. Although De Preester provides excellent examples, they do not seem cohesive enough to support this conclusion, primarily as the analysis of the Anthropocene’s triad, as pointed out in the introduction (Earth–Technology–Humankind), requires a thorough insight into the role that Technology plays in its constitution.



中文翻译:

人类世的生活和思维载体的观点

海伦娜·普雷斯特(Helena De Preester)的“人类世间的主观性和先验幻觉”旨在从人类世俗的背景下从根本上重新思考人与技术之间的关系。从本质上讲,本文关注的是人类在人类世中的当前主观形式,并分析了其如何嵌入知识,欲望和行为。德Preester在创造人类世时代人的主体特征的当前表单的一个强有力的,引人入胜的反思确实成功,参照维兰·傅拉瑟的设备,麦肯齐·沃克的vectoralist类,斯蒂格勒的处世-生活乐趣成瘾的对象,罗伯特Pfaller的概念的互消; 威廉姆斯的注意力经济等。然而,德·普雷斯特(De Preester)在其整篇文章中,尽管充分讨论了人类世间的上述主观性和先验幻觉的观点(与论文形式所允许的程度一样),但她缺乏从根本上重新思考的雄心勃勃的愿望。人类时代背景下的人与技术关系。尽管德普雷斯特(De Preester)提供了很好的例子,但它们似乎缺乏足够的凝聚力来支持这一结论,主要是因为引言(地球-技术-人类)中对人类世三部曲的分析,需要对技术的作用有深入的了解。在其宪法中发挥作用。

更新日期:2021-03-12
down
wechat
bug