ABSTRACT

Reception measures have been implemented in many EU countries, as part of an articulated framework of European, national, subnational, local normative arrangements. This paper states the need for more attention on the division of responsibility among government levels and forms of contention associated with it, moving beyond the Scholten’s framework (2013) focused on actors’ coordination. In doing so, it argues that an increased focus on the welfare perspective can illuminate how a parallel, exceptional system of welfare has been created and consolidatedad hoc for forced migrants, with potentially negative impacts on their social protection. The argument builds on empirical evidence collected in Italy in the period 2014-2020. Beyond the specificity of the Italian case, the paper aims to put forward a more general discussion on how the literature on welfare can provide a useful theoretical background to analyse the relationship between forced migrants and the city.

摘要

作为欧洲、国家、地方、地方规范性安排的明确框架的一部分，许多欧盟国家已经实施了接纳措施。本文指出，需要更多地关注政府层级之间的责任分工以及与之相关的竞争形式，超越 Scholten 的框架（2013 年），重点是行动者的协调。在此过程中，它认为，更加注重福利的角度可以照亮如何并行，福利优越的系统已经建立并巩固特设 对于被迫移民，可能对其社会保护产生负面影响。该论点建立在 2014-2020 年期间在意大利收集的经验证据之上。除了意大利案例的特殊性之外，本文旨在就福利文献如何为分析强迫移民与城市之间的关系提供有用的理论背景提出更一般的讨论。