Philosophers suggested that usual picture perception requires the simultaneous occurrence of the perception of the surface and of the depicted object. However, there are special cases of picture perception, such as trompe l'oeil perception, in which, unlike in usual picture perception, the object looks like a real, present object we can interact with, of the kind we are usually acquainted with in face-to-face perception. While philosophers suggested that usual picture perception and trompe l'oeil perception must differ with respect to the perception of the surface, nobody has ever proposed a final explanatory account for such a difference. Here, I propose such an account. I consider the two possible options as candidates for the explanation of the illusory power of trompe l'oeil perception. The first is that, with trompe l'oeils, we perceive the surface unconsciously. The second is that, with trompe l'oeils, we cannot perceive the surface at all, that is, we cannot perceive it either consciously or unconsciously. I show that the second option is the unique plausible option, as it is in line with vision science, and with our received view about the nature of usual picture perception.

中文翻译：

---

为什么 Trompe l'oeils 会欺骗我们的视觉体验

哲学家认为，通常的图像感知需要同时发生对表面和所描绘对象的感知。然而，也有图像感知的特殊情况，例如错视画感知，在这种情况下，与通常的图像感知不同，对象看起来像我们可以与之互动的真实的、当前的对象，是我们通常熟悉的那种。面对面的感知。虽然哲学家建议通常的图像感知和错视画感知必须相对于表面的感知有所不同，没有人曾经提出过对这种差异的最终解释。在这里，我提出这样一个帐户。我认为这两种可能的选择是解释错视画感知的虚幻力量的候选者。首先是，在trompe l'oeil s 中，我们无意识地感知表面。第二个是，对于trompe l'oeil s，我们根本无法感知表面，也就是说，我们无法有意识或无意识地感知它。我表明，第二个选项是独特的合理选项，因为它符合视觉科学，也符合我们对通常图片感知本质的公认观点。