In the European Union (EU), agenda setting is formally centralized at the European Commission. During the last decade since the Lisbon Treaty, however, this agenda-setting monopoly was challenged by other institutions against the backdrop of the Treaty change, intergovernmental crisis management, politicization, and more informal legislative bargaining. This symposium therefore surveys the emerging agenda-setting powers of the EU's other main institutional actors in their relation to the Commission. The introduction provides a conceptual framework, distinguishing between procedural and discursive agenda-setting power, as well as gatekeeping power and agenda leadership. Based on this typology, we argue that not only the European Council (agenda leadership) but even the Court of Justice of the EU (procedural agenda setting) and the European Parliament (discursive agenda setting) gained more influence on policy decisions through their informal agenda-setting activities. The landscape has thus become variegated, and the Commission, although remaining center stage, now depends more strongly on interinstitutional alliances.

中文翻译：

---

重新映射欧洲议程设置格局

在欧盟 (EU)，议程设置正式集中在欧盟委员会。然而，在里斯本条约签署后的最后十年中，在条约变更、政府间危机管理、政治化和更非正式的立法谈判的背景下，这种议程设置垄断受到了其他机构的挑战。因此，本次研讨会调查了欧盟其他主要机构参与者在与委员会的关系中新兴的议程设置权力。引言提供了一个概念框架，区分了程序性和话语性议程设置权，以及把关权和议程领导权。基于这种类型，我们认为，不仅欧洲理事会（议程领导），甚至欧盟法院（程序议程设置）和欧洲议会（议事议程设置）都通过非正式的议程设置活动对政策决策产生了更大的影响。因此，情况变得多样化，委员会虽然仍处于中心舞台，但现在更加依赖于机构间联盟。