Is there any number of people you should save from paralysis rather than saving one person from death? Is there any number of people you should save from a migraine rather than saving one person from death? Many people answer ‘yes’ and ‘no’, respectively. The aim of partially aggregative moral views is to capture and justify combinations of intuitions like these. These views contrast with fully aggregative moral views, which imply that the answer to both questions is ‘yes’, and with non‐aggregative moral views, which imply that the answer to both questions is ‘no’. In this article, I review the most natural and influential ways of developing partially aggregative views and explain the main problems they face.

中文翻译：

---

道德中的部分聚集

您应该从瘫痪中拯救多少人，而不是从死亡中拯救一个人？您应该从偏头痛中拯救多少人，而不是让一个人脱离死亡？许多人分别回答“是”和“否”。部分整合道德观念的目的是捕获并证明此类直觉的组合。这些观点与完全聚集的道德观点（这两个问题的答案都是“是”）和非聚集性道德观点（这两个问题的答案都是“否”）形成对比。在本文中，我回顾了发展部分聚合视图的最自然和最有影响力的方法，并解释了它们面临的主要问题。