This study examined (in)congruences between beliefs and practices of EFL university teachers on in-class oral corrective feedback (OCF). The participants were 20 university English language teachers from a private university in Turkey. Data were collected via video-recorded non-participant detached observation, a task about OCF to determine the beliefs of the teachers, and a stimulated recall interview. The results showed incongruence between what the teachers said they believed and what they did. However, teachers’ beliefs and practices were similar regarding whether the errors should be corrected, when errors should be corrected, and who should correct them. Particularly notable in this study was the finding that those teachers with the greatest incongruence almost always stood by their decisions, even after they watched their unsuccessful OCF practices.

中文翻译：

---

教师对大学英语课堂口语纠正反馈的信念和实践

本研究检查了 EFL 大学教师对课堂口头纠正反馈 (OCF) 的信念和实践之间的一致性。参与者是来自土耳其一所私立大学的 20 名大学英语教师。数据是通过视频记录的非参与者分离观察、关于 OCF 的任务来确定教师的信念，以及刺激性回忆访谈。结果表明，老师们所说的他们相信的和他们所做的不一致。然而，对于错误是否应该纠正、何时纠正以及由谁纠正，教师的信念和实践是相似的。在这项研究中特别值得注意的是发现那些最不一致的老师几乎总是坚持他们的决定，