This contribution reports on a study of questioning turns in German and English football post‐match interviews (PMIs). Previous research on PMIs suggests that their main aim is to provide room for a delivery of the player's perspective of the match, thereby foregrounding his expertise and experience. The study uses a conversation analytic approach to focus on how interviewers design their turns in order to achieve this foregrounding. It is shown that participants employ means to systematically maintain an epistemic balance that reflects the player's epistemic access to the match as more authoritative. Furthermore, while both German and English interviewers perform similar actions in their turns, there are significant differences in the use of overtly marked questions, revealing different overall strategies of foregrounding.

中文翻译：

---

赛后访谈中的认识论：侧重于质疑转牌设计

该贡献报告了一项关于德语和英语足球赛后采访（PMI）的质疑转折的研究的报告。先前对PMI的研究表明，它们的主要目的是为玩家提供比赛视角提供空间，从而凸显其专业知识和经验。该研究使用对话分析的方法，着重于访问员如何设计他们的轮次以实现这一前景。结果表明，参与者采用手段来系统地保持认识上的平衡，这种平衡反映了球员对比赛的认识上的权威性。此外，尽管德语和英语访问者轮流执行类似的操作，但是在使用公开标记的问题方面存在显着差异，从而揭示了不同的前台总体策略。