Research has noted an increase in negative workplace behaviours in the higher education sector between leaders and staff. A component of this change has been attributed to the managerial shift associated with faculty leadership roles. Positions such as dean are now sometimes filled via evidence of management experience when traditionally these roles were awarded to senior academics. This paper argues that the workplace divides between leaders employed due to management expertise (and with less regard to their research accomplishments) and academics has created new fault lines in institutional hierarchies that are impacting on intra‐faculty relationships as each group adjusts to contemporary institutional management strategies. Bourdieu's notions of habitus, capital, and field are used to dissect these fault lines and hierarchical structures to assist in understanding why the leadership shift is causing divides, if the issue is likely to continue creating rifts, and if the divide can be repaired.

中文翻译：

---

通过布迪厄斯主义的视角研究大学的领导能力和工作场所敌对情绪的增加

研究表明，在高等教育领域，领导者和员工之间负面的工作场所行为有所增加。这种变化的一部分归因于与教师领导角色相关的管理变动。传统上将这些角色授予高级学者时，现在有时会通过管理经验的证据来填补诸如院长等职位。本文认为，工作场所在因管理专业知识而受聘的领导者之间（并且较少考虑他们的研究成就）而划分，而学者们则在制度层次结构中创建了新的断层线，随着每个群体适应当代制度管理，均会影响教职内部的关系。策略。布迪厄的习惯，资本，