Humans, Religion, and Normativity

The first thematic section of this issue of Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, on “Humans, Religion, and Normativity,” features two articles. Bruce Reichenbach analyzes three phases of philosophical thought regarding what it is to be human; for the last phase identified, strong artificial intelligence (AI), he asks the question of where in strong AI intentional action and providing moral justification, that is, normativity, is to be found—he sees an incompatibility between strong AI and a Christian understanding of personhood. Joona Auvinen provides a critical examination of whether or not, and in what way exactly, the aims characteristic of religious practice are normatively significant; he argues that this is highly dependent both on controversial issues concerning the nature of religion, and on a number of controversial metanormative issues.

中文翻译：

---

规范性和圣经批评

人类，宗教和规范

Zygon本期的第一个主题部分：宗教与科学杂志在“人类，宗教和规范”一文中，有两篇文章。布鲁斯·赖兴巴赫（Bruce Reichenbach）分析了关于人类是什么的哲学思想的三个阶段。对于确定的最后一个阶段，即强人工智能（AI），他提出了一个问题，即强AI的故意行为和提供道德辩护的地方，即规范性，可以在哪里找到-他看到强AI与基督徒的理解不相容。的人格。乔纳·欧文（Joona Auvinen）批判性地考察了宗教实践的目标是否具有规范意义，以及以何种方式确切地具有了意义。他认为，这既取决于与宗教性质有关的有争议的问题，也取决于许多有争议的元规范问题。