In my comments, I address two issues that are important but not central to the paper under review here. First, I present a reading of the postphenomenological concept of multistability by going back to Merleau-Ponty’s notion of the primacy of perception. I conclude that assertions affirming the multistability of technologies should not be seen as merely empirical. Second, I address the adequacy of using the language of ‘empirical’ and ‘transcendental’ as a means to categorize exclusionary approaches in philosophy of technology.

中文翻译：

---

关于偏离“经验性转向”（但不必转向先验）

在我的评论中，我讨论了两个重要的问题，但这两个问题对于本文所审阅的论文而言并不重要。首先，我将回到梅洛-庞蒂关于感知至上的概念来阅读对多稳定性的后现象学概念。我得出的结论是，肯定技术的多重稳定性的主张不应仅凭经验得出。其次，我要解决的问题是使用“经验的”和“超越的”语言作为对技术哲学中的排斥方法进行分类的一种手段。