Comment by Bábek et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005916) is concerning the interpretation of realized geophysical measurements. Since, to our knowledge, Klanica et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005663) conducted the deepest geophysical surveys in the area, a scale of work was probably misunderstood within the interpretation of our results. Second, a large number of objections arise from the comment about the post‐Badenian geological development at the eastern margin of the Bohemian Massif. However, evidence for the time when particular geological processes took place is not definite and our conclusions of our study can be related to early Badenian age.

中文翻译：

---

回复巴贝克等人的评论。Hranice Abyss（捷克共和国）举例说明的深水洞穴的深层与表观成因的起源（捷克共和国）—世界上最深的淡水洞穴：世界上最深的水下洞穴Hranice Abyss能否真正达到1公里的深度？

Bábek等人的评论。（2020年，https：//doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005916）涉及已实现的地球物理测量的解释。由于据我们所知，Klanica等人。（2020，https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005663）对该地区进行了最深入的地球物理调查，在解释我们的结果时可能误解了一定规模的工作。第二，对波希米亚断层块东缘的巴登后地质发展的评论引起了很多反对。但是，发生特定地质过程的时间的证据尚不确定，我们的研究结论可能与早期的巴登尼亚时代有关。