Abstract

In Le Mans in July 1562, the Protestant troops who had been occupying the town left abruptly, and the Catholic population soon developed the tradition that the Huguenots’ panic was due to a miracle performed by the town’s patron saint, St. Scholastique. In 1667, Claude Blondeau, a Catholic lawyer, disputed this local memory of the First War of Religion and ignited a published dispute over the nature of historical evidence and the status of Church tradition. Blondeau by no means supported the Reformed takeover of his city, but he also intensely criticized the Catholic retributory violence that followed. The argument over the miracle of St. Scholastique demonstrates that disagreements concerning the memory and meaning of the Wars of Religion endured in French towns into Louis XIV’s reign and had implications for religious toleration and political order at a time when the stipulations of the Edict of Nantes were subject to erosion.

中文翻译：

---

1562年的改革后的土地恐慌：辩论十七世纪的勒芒的奇迹和记忆

摘要

1562年7月，在勒芒，占领该镇的新教徒部队突然离开，天主教徒很快形成了一种传统，即雨果诺族人的恐慌归因于该镇的守护神圣舒拉斯蒂克（St. Scholastique）创造的奇迹。1667年，天主教律师克劳德·金发诺（Claude Blondau）对当地对第一次宗教战争的记忆提出异议，并引发了有关历史证据的性质和教会传统地位的公开争议。金发堡绝不支持改革派对他的城市的接管，但他也强烈批评了随之而来的天主教报应性暴力。关于圣奇迹的争论