当前位置: X-MOL 学术Evaluation and Program Planning › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Evaluation as a social practice: Disenchantment, rationalities and ethics
Evaluation and Program Planning ( IF 1.886 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-09 , DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101927
Robert Picciotto 1
Affiliation  

We live in an age where evaluation is omnipresent. However, as a social practice, it has become hard to distinguish from auditing, inspection, quality assurance and other means of social control. As a result, the evaluation occupation is now widely viewed as intrusive and burdensome – a self-serving commercial enterprise. Yet, evaluation at its creation was conceived (or perhaps imagined) as a vocation devoted to the public good. This article probes the root causes of the spreading disenchantment; puts Weber’s logic of social action to work; and puts his rationalities concepts to work to explore the ethical and professional challenges currently faced by the evaluation community.



中文翻译:

作为一种社会实践的评价:祛魅、理性与伦理

我们生活在一个评价无处不在的时代。然而,作为一种社会实践,它已经很难与审计、检查、质量保证等社会控制手段区分开来。因此,评估职业现在被广泛认为是侵入性和繁重的——一种自私的商业企业。然而,评估在其创建时被设想(或可能被想象)为致力于公共利益的职业。本文探讨祛魅蔓延的根源;将韦伯的社会行动逻辑付诸实践;并将他的理性概念用于探索评估界目前面临的道德和专业挑战。

更新日期:2021-03-22
down
wechat
bug