当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Sexual Aggression › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Online dialogue surrounding violence against women in South Africa: a qualitative analysis of #MenAreTrash
Journal of Sexual Aggression ( IF 1.217 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-08 , DOI: 10.1080/13552600.2021.1892219
Catherine D’Avanzato 1, 2 , Katherine W. Bogen 2 , Caroline Kuo 3, 4 , Lindsay M. Orchowski 1, 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

In April of 2017, individuals utilised the hashtag #MenAreTrash to comment on the murder of Karabo Mokoena in South Africa, fostering a broader dialogue of men’s engagement in violence against women. The present study conducted a thematic analysis of a sample of 2035 tweets with the hashtag #MenAreTrash. Comments that expressed support for the hashtag commented on men’s engagement in violence and non-violent mistreatment towards women, highlighted the importance of holding men accountable for misconduct, and called attention to defensive reactions to the hashtag itself. Other users critiqued the use of the hashtag, suggesting that the hashtag was ineffective in engaging men as allies in preventing violence against women, criticising users of the hashtag, or minimising the seriousness of men’s violence against women. The dialogue highlights the challenges of raising awareness regarding men’s perpetration of violence against women while also engaging men as allies in violence prevention efforts.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03179982.



中文翻译:

围绕南非暴力侵害妇女行为的在线对话:#MenAreTrash 的定性分析

摘要

2017 年 4 月,个人利用#MenAreTrash 话题标签评论了南非 Karabo Mokoena 的谋杀案,促进了男性参与暴力侵害女性行为的更广泛对话。本研究对带有#MenAreTrash 标签的 2035 条推文样本进行了主题分析。支持标签的评论评论了男性对女性的暴力和非暴力虐待,强调了让男性对不当行为负责的重要性,并呼吁注意对标签本身的防御性反应。其他用户批评了该标签的使用,表明该标签无法有效地让男性成为防止暴力侵害妇女行为的盟友,批评该标签的用户,或尽量减少男性对女性施暴的严重性。

试用注册: ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03179982.

更新日期:2021-03-08
down
wechat
bug