This paper situates organisational transparency in an agonistic space that is shaped by the interplay of ‘mechanisms of power that adhere to a truth’ and critical practices that come from below in a movement of ‘not being governed like that and at that cost’ (Foucault, 2003: 265). This positioning involves an understanding of transparency as a practice that is historically contingent and multiple, and thus negotiable and contested. By illustrating the entanglement of ‘power through transparency’ and ‘counter-transparency’ with reference to the example of Edward Snowden’s whistleblowing, the paper contributes to the critique of transparency and to debates on the use of Foucauldian concepts in post-panoptic contexts of organising. By introducing the notion of ‘counter-transparency’, the paper expands the conceptual vocabulary for understanding the politics and ethics of managing and organising visibility.

本文将组织透明性置于一个激烈的空间中，该空间由``坚持真理的力量机制''与来自下方的批判实践之间的相互作用所形成，这种行为来自``不像那样并以此为代价而受到治理''的运动（Foucault ，2003：265）。这种定位涉及对透明性的理解，这种透明性在历史上是偶然的并且是多重的，因此可以商讨和争论。通过以爱德华·斯诺登的举报为例说明“通过透明的力量”和“反透明”的纠缠，本文有助于对透明性进行批判，并就在全景化后的组织环境中对福柯思想的使用进行了辩论。 。通过引入“反透明度”的概念，