ABSTRACT In this article, the author advances the concept of aesthetic injustice, which denotes any harm done to someone specifically in her capacity as an aesthetic being, and explores four dimensions of this new philosophical concept. First, the author appeals to the notion of colonial mentality presented by Amílcar Cabral in order to show how aesthetic injustice is experienced differently by the oppressors and the oppressed. Then, the author engages critically with Augusto Boal’s The Aesthetics of the Oppressed and underscores the mutual influence between aesthetic injustice and epistemic injustice. Next, the author suggests how both types of injustice may be resisted by dint of an analysis of Boal’s Theatre of the Oppressed and The Rainbow of Desire. The author concludes by examining how aesthetic injustice is inimical to democracy and by explaining why a democratic regime requires aesthetic justice, a normative concept according to which all citizens are equally entitled to have their way of seeing and feeling about public issues taken into account in political deliberation.

中文翻译：

---

审美不公

摘要在本文中，作者提出了审美不公的概念，它表示对某人的任何伤害，特别是因为她的审美存在而造成的伤害，并探讨了这种新哲学概念的四个方面。首先，作者诉诸于阿米尔卡尔·卡布拉尔（AmílcarCabral）提出的殖民心态概念，以表明压迫者和被压迫者如何不同地体验审美上的不公正。然后，作者批判性地参与了奥古斯托·布尔（Augusto Boal）的《被压迫者的美学》，并强调了审美不公与认知不公之间的相互影响。接下来，作者建议通过对Boal的被压迫剧院和《欲望的彩虹》的分析来抵制两种类型的不公正。