In this research, we compared the Round Robin (RR) and the Proportional Fair (PF) algorithms for different user equipment density scenarios using voice and video traffic, to evaluate the key impact on performance of 5G mmwave network. This research simulated on NS3.27 with an integrated mmwave module. Based on the result, we found that the RR is a good choice for voice traffic. It has a throughput of 3.65% better than PF with similar fairness index. On the other hand, we found that the PF is the right choice for video traffic due to has better result for throughput. It has a throughput of 1.24% better than RR. For fairness index round robin has better result for voice and video traffic.

中文翻译：

---

网络模拟器在5G网络上的性能评估和调度算法比较

在这项研究中，我们比较了使用语音和视频流量的不同用户设备密度情况下的轮询（RR）算法和比例公平（PF）算法，以评估对5G毫米波网络性能的关键影响。这项研究在带有集成毫米波模块的NS3.27上进行了仿真。根据结果​​，我们发现RR是语音流量的不错选择。它的吞吐量比具有相似公平指数的PF高3.65％。另一方面，我们发现PF是视频流量的正确选择，因为它具有更好的吞吐量结果。它的吞吐量比RR高1.24％。对于公平性指数而言，轮询对语音和视频流量具有更好的效果。