当前位置: X-MOL 学术Inj. Prev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Exploring injury intentionality and mechanism via ICD-10-CM injury codes and self-reported injury in a large, urban emergency department
Injury Prevention ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-01 , DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043508
Michael J Clery 1, 2 , Philip Joseph Hudson 3 , Jasmine C Moore 2 , Laura M Mercer Kollar 4 , Daniel T Wu 2, 5
Affiliation  

Health systems capture injuries using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes and share data with public health to inform injury surveillance. This study analyses provider-assigned ICD-10-CM injury codes among self-reported injuries to determine the effectiveness of ICD-10-CM coding in capturing injury and assault. Methods Self-reported injury screen records from an urban, level 1 trauma centre collected between 20 November 2015 and 30 September 2019 were compared with corresponding provider-assigned ICD-10-CM codes discerning the frequency in which intentions are indicated among patients reporting (1) any injury and (2) assault. Results Of 380 922 patients screened, 32 788 (8.61%) reported any injury and 6763 (1.78%) reported assault. ICD-10-CM codes had a sensitivity of 67.40% (95% CI 66.89% to 67.91%) for any injury and specificity of 89.79% (95% CI 89.69% to 89.89%]). For assault, ICD-10-CM codes had sensitivity of 2.25% (95% CI 1.91% to 2.63%) and specificity of 99.97% (95% CI 99.97% 99.98%). Discussion This study found provider-assigned ICD-10-CM had limited sensitivity to identify injury and low sensitivity for assault. This study more fully characterises ICD-10-CM coding system effectiveness in identifying assaults.

中文翻译:

通过ICD-10-CM伤害代码和大型城市急诊室的自我报告伤害探索伤害意图和机制

卫生系统使用疾病和相关健康问题的国际统计分类第 10 版、临床修改 (ICD-10-CM) 诊断代码捕获伤害,并与公共卫生共享数据以告知伤害监测。本研究在自我报告的伤害中分析了提供者指定的 ICD-10-CM 伤害代码,以确定 ICD-10-CM 编码在捕获伤害和攻击方面的有效性。方法 将 2015 年 11 月 20 日至 2019 年 9 月 30 日期间收集的来自城市 1 级创伤中心的自我报告伤害筛查记录与相应的提供者分配的 ICD-10-CM 代码进行比较,以辨别报告患者的意图指示频率(1 ) 任何伤害和 (2) 攻击。结果 在接受筛查的 380 922 名患者中,32 788 名(8.61%)报告有任何伤害,6763 名(1.78%)报告了袭击事件。ICD-10-CM 代码对任何损伤的敏感性为 67.40%(95% CI 66.89% 至 67.91%),特异性为 89.79%(95% CI 89.69% 至 89.89%])。对于攻击,ICD-10-CM 代码的敏感性为 2.25%(95% CI 1.91% 至 2.63%),特异性为 99.97%(95% CI 99.97% 99.98%)。讨论 本研究发现,提供者指定的 ICD-10-CM 对识别伤害的敏感性有限,对攻击的敏感性较低。这项研究更全面地描述了 ICD-10-CM 编码系统在识别攻击方面的有效性。讨论 本研究发现,提供者指定的 ICD-10-CM 对识别伤害的敏感性有限,对攻击的敏感性较低。这项研究更全面地描述了 ICD-10-CM 编码系统在识别攻击方面的有效性。讨论 本研究发现,提供者指定的 ICD-10-CM 对识别伤害的敏感性有限,对攻击的敏感性较低。这项研究更全面地描述了 ICD-10-CM 编码系统在识别攻击方面的有效性。
更新日期:2021-03-05
down
wechat
bug