Kiran Pienaar (KP) and Alan Petersen (AP): Thank you, Annemarie, for agreeing to share your perspectives in this interview. We are delighted to have this opportunity to engage with your insights and scholarly contributions on the sociology of diagnosis.

In 2011 you co-edited a special issue of Social Science and Medicine entitled ‘Toward a Sociology of Diagnosis’ in which you called for sociologists to pay more attention to medical diagnosis as a central practice and classification tool of medicine. In the introduction, you note that ‘diagnosis has had an absent presence in the sociology of health and illness’ (Jutel & Nettleton, 2011, p. 793). Do you think this is still the case or has the field developed since then to attend more closely to the social issues and processes at work in diagnosis? In your view, does diagnosis merit continued/renewed sociological attention? And if so, why?

Kiran Pienaar（KP）和Alan Petersen（AP）：谢谢Annemarie，她同意在这次采访中分享您的观点。我们很高兴有这个机会与您就诊断社会学的见解和学术贡献进行交流。

在2011年，您与他人合着了《社会科学与医学》特刊，题为“迈向诊断的社会学”，其中呼吁社会学家更加重视医学诊断，将其作为医学的主要实践和分类工具。在引言中，您指出“在健康和疾病的社会学中缺少诊断”（Jutel＆Nettleton，2011，p.793）。您认为情况仍然如此，还是自那时以来发展了这个领域，以便更密切地参与诊断工作中的社会问题和过程？您认为诊断值得继续/重新引起社会学关注吗？如果是这样，为什么呢？