当前位置: X-MOL 学术Perspect. Psychol. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Psychological Science Is Not Race Neutral
Perspectives on Psychological Science ( IF 12.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-02 , DOI: 10.1177/1745691620979820
Cydney H Dupree 1 , Michael W Kraus 1, 2
Affiliation  

In their analysis in a previous issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science, Roberts and colleagues argued that the editors, authors, and participants throughout subfields of psychological science are overwhelmingly White. In this commentary, we consider some of the drivers and consequences of this racial inequality. Drawing on race scholarship from within and outside the field, we highlight three phenomena that create and maintain racial inequality in psychology: (a) racial ignorance, (b) threats to belonging, and (c) racial-progress narratives. We close by exploring steps that journals and authors can take to reduce racial inequality in our field, ending with an appeal to consider the experience of scholars of color in race scholarship and in psychological science more broadly.



中文翻译:

心理科学不是种族中立的

在前一期《心理科学展望》的分析中,罗伯茨及其同事认为,心理科学各个子领域的编辑、作者和参与者绝大多数都是白人。在这篇评论中,我们考虑了这种种族不平等的一些驱动因素和后果。利用该领域内外的种族学术,我们强调了三种在心理学上造成和维持种族不平等的现象:(a) 种族无知,(b) 对归属的威胁,以及 ​​(c) 种族进步的叙述。最后,我们探索期刊和作者可以采取哪些措施来减少我们领域的种族不平等,最后呼吁更广泛地考虑有色人种学者在种族学术和心理科学方面的经验。

更新日期:2021-03-03
down
wechat
bug