当前位置: X-MOL 学术Emotion, Space and Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Care in/through the archives: Postcolonial intersectional moves in feminist geographic research
Emotion, Space and Society ( IF 1.837 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-03 , DOI: 10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100768
Caroline Faria , Martina Angela Caretta , Elizabeth Dever , Suzanne Nimoh

What does a postcolonial ethics of care mean for feminist geographers doing archival work? Feminist geographers have long called for ethical research engagement. This asserts the importance of caring relationships with research mentees, collaborators, participants, and spaces. But care comes both with promise and pitfalls. As postcolonial and antiracist geographers argue, we must emplace care. That is, we must recognize that care, including caring feminist geographic practice, is grounded in colonial past-presents. We must work towards responsible ontologies and epistemologies that attend to and redress these histories. In this article, we draw on feminist postcolonial work on care (namely Raghuram et al. (2009) and Noxolo et al. (2012)) along with intersectional interventions in archival studies (Hartman, 2008; Cifor and Wood, 2017; Sutherland, 2017) to examine the politics of care in and through the archives. We draw on postcolonial interventions to reflect on our own archival geographic practice in the USA, the Dominican Republic, and Uganda. We use these accounts to make visible how caring archival practice, and critical archives of care, can shed light on, reinforce, or salve deep geohistories of heteropatriarchal colonialism and its aftermath. We assert that a postcolonial approach to care denaturalizes and spatializes racial power in feminist geographic practice, here via the archives.



中文翻译:

照管/通过档案:女权主义地理研究中的后殖民时期相交举动

后殖民主义的照顾伦理对从事档案工作的女权地理学家意味着什么?女权主义地理学家长期以来一直呼吁开展伦理研究。这证明了与研究对象,合作者,参与者和空间保持良好关系的重要性。但是,关怀既有希望,也有陷阱。正如后殖民地和反种族主义者所言,我们必须关心。也就是说,我们必须认识到,关心,包括关心女权主义的地理实践,是建立在殖民地过去的存在基础上的。我们必须努力研究和纠正这些历史的负责任的本体论和认识论。在本文中,我们借鉴了女权主义的后殖民护理工作(即Raghuram等人(2009)和Noxolo等人(2012))以及档案研究中的交叉干预(Hartman,2008; Cifor和Wood,2017; Sutherland,2009)。 2017年),以检查档案中和档案中的护理政治。我们利用后殖民主义的干预措施来反思我们在美国,多米尼加共和国和乌干达的档案地理实践。我们使用这些帐户来说明关爱的档案实践和重要的护理档案如何可以发现,加强,或挽救异族宗族殖民主义及其后果的深厚地理历史。我们断言,后殖民主义的护理方法在女性主义地理实践中通过文献将种族权力变性和空间化。

更新日期:2021-03-03
down
wechat
bug