How is accountability in safety management affected in and by public–private urban multiroute stations? To help address this question, major interchanges with newly tunneled lines in London and Stockholm are studied: Stratford station and Stockholm Station City. Differences in origin, national and regional significance, and specific governance features of these megaprojects are identified. Accountability in safety management appears more critiqued in the Swedish case, possibly related to comparatively higher attention to particularities of this “bottleneck” national nexus. Wrought with albeit less visible geographical and geological constraints, the comparative magnitude of London and acclimatization to projects has explanatory value. Similarity in the patchwork of public–private actors, implying fragmented governance jeopardizing accountability is observed in both cases. Both megaprojects span decades, with turnover and lack of institutional memory posing further challenges for accountability and safety. A major finding is that, complementary to standard risk analysis, accountability in the governance of infrastructural megaprojects begs improvement.

中文翻译：

---

城市轨道交汇处的问责制和拼凑治理：伦敦横贯铁路和斯德哥尔摩城市线的交汇点比较

公共-私营城市多路车站内和受其影响的安全管理问责制如何？为了帮助解决这个问题，我们研究了伦敦和斯德哥尔摩新隧道线路的主要交汇处：斯特拉特福车站和斯德哥尔摩车站城。确定了这些大型项目在起源、国家和地区意义以及具体治理特征方面的差异。在瑞典的案例中，安全管理中的问责制似乎受到更多批评，这可能与对这种“瓶颈”国家关系的特殊性相对较高的关注有关。尽管不太明显的地理和地质限制，伦敦的相对规模和项目的适应情况具有解释价值。公私行动者拼凑的相似性，在这两种情况下都可以观察到，这意味着分散的治理危及问责制。这两个大型项目都跨越了数十年，人员流动和缺乏机构记忆对问责制和安全性构成了进一步挑战。一个主要发现是，作为标准风险分析的补充，基础设施大型项目治理中的问责制需要改进。