Abstract

This comment assesses the approach to the reach of defences beyond the international legal person(s) who is (or are) the author(s) of the internationally wrongful act articulated in Guiding Principle 5 of the Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility in International Law. It will focus on three main points: (1) whether the choice in respect of the reach of defences in Principle 5 is justifiable for the international legal order; (2) the reach of defences in cases of coercion, where the coerced party may benefit from a defence due to the coercion (in the form of a force majeure defence); and (3) the ‘blindspot’ in the Guiding Principles in relation to defences of accessories, in particular where the conditions for accessorial liability are defined broadly as in the case of Principle 6 on aid and assistance.

中文翻译：

---

国际法中的共同非责任？指导原则中的共同参与人及其附属品的抗辩及责任

摘要

该评论评估了国际法人（国际法人分担责任指导原则指导原则5中阐明的国际不法行为的作者）（或是国际法人的作者）提供的辩护方法。它将着重于三个主要方面：（1）原则5中的辩护范围选择是否对国际法律秩序而言是合理的；（2）在被胁迫的情况下被告方可以达到抗辩的范围，在这种情况下，被胁迫方可因被胁迫而受益于抗辩（以不可抗力辩护的形式）；（3）《指导原则》中关于配件防御的“盲点”，特别是在辅助责任的条件如关于援助和协助的原则6中被广泛定义的情况下。