ABSTRACT

In this paper, we examine the legal case involving the Court of Arbitration of Sport (CAS), the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), and the Turkish team Eskişehirspor to analyze the legitimacy of third-party incentives to win in European professional football. We first present arguments for the legalization of such incentives. Then, we analyze four ethical arguments, namely the equivalency argument, the conventionalist argument, the integrity argument, and the fairness argument. We conclude that none of the arguments provides enough ground for the legalization of third-party incentives in European professional football.

中文翻译：

---

第三方激励赢得欧洲足球比赛的道德和法律影响

摘要

在本文中，我们研究了涉及体育仲裁法院 (CAS)、欧洲足球协会联盟 (UEFA) 和土耳其球队 Eskişehirspor 的法律案例，以分析第三方激励在欧洲职业足球比赛中获胜的合法性. 我们首先提出将此类激励措施合法化的论点。然后，我们分析了四种伦理论证，即等效论证、约定主义论证、完整性论证和公平论证。我们的结论是，这些论点都没有为欧洲职业足球中第三方激励的合法化提供足够的依据。