当前位置: X-MOL 学术New Rev. Hypermedia Multimed. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A study of fake news reading and annotating in social media context
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-28 , DOI: 10.1080/13614568.2021.1889691
Jakub Simko 1 , Patrik Racsko 2 , Matus Tomlein 1 , Martina Hanakova 2 , Robert Moro 1 , Maria Bielikova 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

The online spreading of fake news is a major issue threatening entire societies. Much of this spreading is enabled by new media formats, namely social networks and online media sites. Researchers and practitioners have been trying to answer this by characterising the fake news and devising automated methods for detecting them. The detection methods had so far only limited success, mostly due to the complexity of the news content and context and lack of properly annotated datasets. One possible way to boost the efficiency of automated misinformation detection methods is to imitate the detection work of humans. It is also important to understand the news consumption behaviour of online users. In this paper, we present an eye-tracking study, in which we let 44 lay participants to casually read through a social media feed containing posts with news articles, some of which were fake. In a second run, we asked the participants to decide on the truthfulness of these articles. We also describe a follow-up qualitative study with a similar scenario but this time with seven expert fake news annotators. We present the description of both studies, characteristics of the resulting dataset (which we hereby publish) and several findings.



中文翻译:

社交媒体语境下假新闻阅读与注释研究

摘要

假新闻的在线传播是威胁整个社会的主要问题。这种传播在很大程度上是由新媒体格式实现的,即社交网络和在线媒体网站。研究人员和从业者一直试图通过对假新闻进行表征并设计自动检测方法来回答这个问题。到目前为止,检测方法的成功率有限,主要是由于新闻内容和上下文的复杂性以及缺乏正确注释的数据集。提高自动错误信息检测方法效率的一种可能方法是模仿人类的检测工作。了解在线用户的新闻消费行为也很重要。在本文中,我们提出了一项眼动追踪研究,在其中,我们让 44 名非专业参与者随意阅读社交媒体提要,其中包含带有新闻文章的帖子,其中一些是假的。在第二轮中,我们要求参与者决定这些文章的真实性。我们还描述了具有类似场景的后续定性研究,但这次有七位专家假新闻注释者。我们介绍了这两项研究的描述、结果数据集的特征(我们在此发布)和一些发现。

更新日期:2021-02-28
down
wechat
bug