ABSTRACT Problems posed by the ‘Anthropocene’ have caused many feminists to rethink a feminist ethics in a post-anthropocentric vein. In this context, a reconceptualization of the notion of responsibility as response-ability or ability to respond has gained crucial relevance. This article reads ethics of response as feminist takes on problems posed by the Anthropocene, but also as attempts to conceptualize a non-normativist ethics working with and beyond post-structuralism. The theoretical challenge faced by a feminist post-anthropocentric ethics, the article argues, was posed by feminist philosopher Rosi Braidotti as a confrontation of ‘affirmation versus vulnerability’. In revisiting this debate, the article situates the notion of response-ability and outlines the theoretical questions which must be dealt with by an ethics of response: an integration of affirmation and negativity on one hand, and the question of the ethical and political implications of thinking from constitutive relationality on the other hand. By drawing on the work of Isabelle Stengers, the article maps out one possible conceptualization of an ethics of response-ability in more detail. It introduces the etho-ecological practice of responding as composing with otherness, which enables us to conceptualize the notion of response-ability as a concept underpinning a post-anthropocentric, feminist ethics for the Anthropocene.

中文翻译：

---

回应为作文：对人类世后人类中心，女权主义伦理的回应

摘要“人类世”带来的问题使许多女权主义者重新以人类为中心的思想重新审视了女权伦理。在这种情况下，将责任概念重新定义为响应能力或响应能力已具有至关重要的意义。本文解读了回应伦理学，因为女权主义者承担了人类世所带来的问题，但也试图将非规范主义伦理学概念化，这种伦理学与后结构主义一起工作，甚至超越后结构主义。文章认为，女权主义的人类后人类伦理学面临的理论挑战是女权主义哲学家罗西·布雷多蒂（Rosi Braidotti）提出的“肯定与脆弱”的对立。在重新讨论这一辩论时，本文提出了响应能力的概念，并概述了响应伦理必须解决的理论问题：一方面是肯定与否定的融合，另一方面是基于本构关系的思维的伦理和政治含义问题。通过利用Isabelle Stengers的工作，本文更详细地描述了响应能力伦理学的一种可能概念。它介绍了响应与异性相结合的生态学实践，这使我们能够将响应能力的概念概念化为人类世后人类中心的女性主义伦理学的基础。该文章更详细地提出了一种应对能力伦理学的可能概念。它介绍了响应与异性相结合的生态学实践，这使我们能够将响应能力的概念概念化为人类世后人类中心的女性主义伦理学的基础。该文章更详细地提出了一种应对能力伦理学的可能概念。它介绍了响应与异性相结合的生态学实践，这使我们能够将响应能力的概念概念化为人类世后人类中心的女性主义伦理学的基础。